Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otago University Hockey Club
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:27, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Otago University Hockey Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I've declined a speedy deletion of this article on the grounds that it is, technically, sourced - however I still have doubts as to whether or not the club is notable, especially considering the likely conflict of interest editing occurring. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 13:21, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - University club, no indication of any form of significant coverage, fails WP:ORG and WP:GNG, just plain not notable. Codf1977 (talk) 13:23, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as above. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:45, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as there is no independent coverage in reliable sources. Armbrust Talk Contribs 20:04, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- As creator of the page, I acknowledge my involvement in the club in question as a member and an officer of the executive next year. However, I respectfully disagree with Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry that this constitutes a conflict of interest, as it is still from a neutral point of view. I however, must concede that the club is not especially notable, and that my main motivation for the creation of the page was that pages for several other University of Otago clubs had Wiki pages. I note that since the beginning of this discusion, and my use of the existence of those pages as support for my advocacy against speedy deletion, two of those pages seem to have been deleted, and another has been nominated. While I consider this a small loss to Wikipedia, if the policy is being implemented consistently, I will not oppose deletion. I direct administrator Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry towards the remaining clubs in the University of Otago navbox, namely Otago University AFC and Otago University Rowing Club which should also probably be deleted. - GintyFrench(talk!) 11:46, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 22:53, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:53, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:53, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. —Adabow (talk · contribs) 08:06, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Smerge this and the other recent club and society articles into Clubs and societies of the University of Otago Grutness...wha? 00:13, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete nothing in gnews [1]. looking forward to someone vaguely arguing we should keep on the basis of WP:PRESERVE. LibStar (talk) 00:42, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per WP:Org and WP:OTHERSTUFF. --Kudpung (talk) 01:46, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.